|
·Women
in Contemporary Turkey·
In
the nineteenth century the Ottoman government began
to adopt the ways of the West. Ottoman reformers
realized that if the Ottoman Empire kept its
traditional system the Empire would eventually be
defeated and swallowed up by the Europeans. At
first, the Ottomans tried to copy only European
technology and technical education. They were
interested in building their economy and national
strength, not in becoming like the Europeans. It
soon became evident that technology alone was not
enough. European strength was based on more than
the presence of factories. European factories
depended on European colleges for ideas. The
colleges depended on the secondary and elementary
schools. An economically developed nation had to be
literate and dedicated to scientific knowledge.
Therefore, the Ottomans began to build schools like
the European schools, even sending students to
Europe to study. Students in the upper schools were
taught European languages.
However, European-style education
was not enough. The economy improved, but the
Empire still lagged far behind Europe. The relative
weakness of the Ottomans ultimately meant that the
Empire was defeated and dismembered in World War I.
Before the war, Turkish reformers had begun to
believe that the real basis of European economic
superiority lay in European culture. What was
needed was a whole nation dedicated to new ways,
not just an educated elite that understood European
technology. The reformers began to suggest
political and social reform, the beginning of the
path to democracy. The disaster of World War I
convinced the Turks that such changes had to be
made.
Under the leadership of Mustafa
Kemal Atat¸rk, the Turks began a policy of
radical Westernization and modernization.
Atat¸rk was a war hero whose leadership had
saved Turkish independence and who had become
president of the new Turkish Republic. Now he used
his prestige to effect change. Schools were built
all over the Republic. They taught a modified
European curriculum. Laws of countries such as
Italy and Switzerland were substituted for the
Ottoman laws. "People's Houses" were set up to
teach adults to read and to understand new ways.
Atat¸rk's government even changed the clothes
Turks wore, discouraging the veil for women and
outlawing traditional headgear for men. Most
important, a start was made on transforming the
political culture of the Turks. People's Houses and
schools taught the principle of equality of all
citizens in place of the idea that a ruling class
deserved to rule. While he lived, Atat¸rk kept
power firmly in his own hands, but he planned and
prepared for democracy.
Like all such changes,
Atat¸rk's reforms sometimes went slowly. Many
times they were frustrated by the natural human
desire to keep what is familiar and avoid change.
Nevertheless, the reforms bore fruit. After World
War II the Turkish Republic became a true
democracy, with different parties contesting
elections. Economic reform went more slowly, but in
the 1950s and 1960s Turkey began to advance rapidly
in that area, as well. Neither politics nor the
economy always went smoothly. The army intervened
when officers believed that politicians were
deviating from Atat¸rk's path of reform. In
the 1970s, civil unrest between leftists and
rightists and high inflation caused a stagnant
economy. The 1980s saw a major change, however, and
Turkey had the highest rate of economic growth of
any country in the Middle East, North Africa, or
Central Asia, despite the fact that it had little
oil.
Perhaps the best example of the
changes in Turkish society is the status of women.
Women's participation in society, politics, and the
economy is a key indicator of success in
development. Women's freedom is also one of the
most difficult aims to achieve. The place of women
in Middle Eastern societies had developed long
before the Turks arrived from Central Asia. It was
based on the need to protect women and children in
dangerous times. The survival of the family
depended on the tradition of men going off to war
(and its corollary, politics) and women maintaining
the family. It was a system that worked, but it was
attuned neither to the needs of a modern society
nor to the equality that is a necessary part of
democracy.
From an early date the ideology
of the Turkish Republic was committed to equality.
Overcoming social and religious obstacles, polygamy
was abolished in 1925. Laws were amended to offer
women equal rights of divorce and inheritance,
which they had not held under Islamic Law. Women
voted in municipal elections in 1934. In the latter
year women were also elected as deputies in the
Parliament. The scope of this achievement is
indicated by the fact that in the United States the
19th amendment recognizing women's right to vote
was only ratified in 1920. Since 1934 women in
Turkey have been politicians and members of
Parliament and cabinet members since 1971.
On the law books, women in Turkey
have been equal for more than half a century.
However, reality has not always matched the law.
Turkey is not the only country to find women's
equality a difficult goal to attain. Tradition dies
hard, especially in the rural areas of Turkey,
where women usually fill more traditional roles. In
the work world, women have done best in
professions, as is the case in Europe and the
United States. They are commonly physicians and
university professors. On the other hand, in
commerce and industry women find it easier to enter
the work force than to rise to the top. In the
home, the majority of house work is still done by
wives and daughters. Yet a great number of educated
women actively oppose this situation. In general,
improvements in the Turkish economy have been
matched by improvements in the status of
women.
All of this has left great
variance among women's lives in modern Turkey. The
life of a typical village woman is different than
that of middle class woman in the cities. The
daughters of many urban families dress in clothes
that might be seen in Paris, Rome, or London. Some
families have followed an Islamic revival (most
have not) and women in these families are
relatively secluded. Economic need has forced women
to work outside the home when they and their
spouses would rather they did not. Some politically
active women call for a return to traditional
values. Although Turkish society is generally more
conservative than Western European or American
society, descriptions of women's position and
women's problems are remarkably similar.
http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Societies/turksoc/intro/turkwom
Home
Page
*Be a member
or make a donation*
You can contact us by e-mail
for more information.
|